The following warnings occurred: | |||||||||||||||
Warning [2] Undefined property: MyLanguage::$archive_pages - Line: 2 - File: printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code PHP 8.2.20 (Linux)
|
![]() |
Safe travels unenforceable? - Printable Version +- Punaweb Forum (http://punaweb.org/forum) +-- Forum: Punaweb Forums (http://punaweb.org/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: Punatalk (http://punaweb.org/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=10) +--- Thread: Safe travels unenforceable? (/showthread.php?tid=22493) |
RE: Safe travels unenforceable? - malahini - 11-13-2021 The thing is disorderly conduct is basically the charge they use when they can't get anything else to stick. It shows what a weak hand they had. It's likely it came out that they admitted to making a ruckus at the airport when they were being detained (possibly unlawfully). There's also the issue I looked up 5 other people and there were zero court records, which says a lot. At this point I'm like 90% sure it's not enforceable and a good lawyer would get everything dropped. It's probable they are afraid it will get overturned which is why the charges keep getting dropped. RE: Safe travels unenforceable? - HereOnThePrimalEdge - 11-13-2021 At this point I'm like 90% sure ... It's probable Or, like 90 some percent of all court cases, charges get dropped. Without a conspiracy behind the reasoning. RE: Safe travels unenforceable? - malahini - 11-13-2021 Which just further proves my point. That it's probably not enforceable. It's looking more and more like you can break quarantine get a good lawyer and tell them to pound sand... And if they keep you detained without a proper charge you have a decent chance in federal court. That is assuming you don't do something stupid enough to make other changes stick. Talking about conspiracy is just a way to try to shut down the argument. RE: Safe travels unenforceable? - HereOnThePrimalEdge - 11-13-2021 Talking about conspiracy is just a way to try to shut down the argument. Whatever works. RE: Safe travels unenforceable? - malahini - 11-13-2021 " Notice of Correction /* An amendment has been made to the violation for Case Number 5DCW-20-0001294. On 20-APR-2021 count 1 was changed as a result of Amended Complaint */" I missed this part before. Thanks Obie. I was stuck in a car and typing from there all day. I don't believe this would happen if it was a a plea bargain. It seems like they knew the reckless endangerment would not stick. Someone who is actually a lawyer correct me if I am wrong. RE: Safe travels unenforceable? - Durian Fiend - 11-13-2021 For those who’ve been caught their vacation has been ruined. That’s disincentive and punishment enough IMO. RE: Safe travels unenforceable? - malahini - 11-13-2021 (11-13-2021, 03:16 AM)Durian Fiend Wrote: For those who’ve been caught their vacation has been ruined. That’s disincentive and punishment enough IMO. If I didn't have better judgement I'd start a gofundme to pay a bunch of homeless people from San Francisco to fly here to Honolulu and then have a lawyer spring them ASAP and record it all. Upload it to Youtube, and try to get national media attention. Then use it as a weapon against Ige and Green. If they keep extending it though, I know how to start some major shit at least. :-) RE: Safe travels unenforceable? - HereOnThePrimalEdge - 11-13-2021 I know how to start some major shit I hope my kids never throw a baseball or frisbee in your yard. RE: Safe travels unenforceable? - TomK - 11-13-2021 (11-13-2021, 03:03 AM)malahini Wrote: I missed this part before. Thanks Obie. I was stuck in a car and typing from there all day. Did you call for help? RE: Safe travels unenforceable? - malahini - 11-13-2021 (11-13-2021, 10:33 AM)TomK Wrote:(11-13-2021, 03:03 AM)malahini Wrote: I missed this part before. Thanks Obie. I was stuck in a car and typing from there all day. I probably should have worded that better. |