The following warnings occurred: | |||||||||||||||
Warning [2] Undefined property: MyLanguage::$archive_pages - Line: 2 - File: printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code PHP 8.2.20 (Linux)
|
Thoughts on Big Island Launch site ? - Printable Version +- Punaweb Forum (http://punaweb.org/forum) +-- Forum: Punaweb Forums (http://punaweb.org/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: Punatalk (http://punaweb.org/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=10) +--- Thread: Thoughts on Big Island Launch site ? (/showthread.php?tid=16993) |
RE: Thoughts on Big Island Launch site ? - pahoated - 03-15-2016 quote:I thought that was a military site, didn't know it was state. It seemed to make some sense as an anti-ballistic missile site location. The reason for the high cost of Alaska is everything has to be imported. A launch pad with a gantry isn't anything without extensive support facilities. Doesn't seem all that marketable for commercial launches. This bill is only for a study, and more for tourism than just commercial and military satellite launches. Space ports are following electronics, becoming very small and streamlined. A 500 acre ranch could be a space port resort by 2050. "Aloha also means goodbye. Aloha!" RE: Thoughts on Big Island Launch site ? - 1voyager1 - 03-16-2016 @ pahoated https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kodiak_Launch_Complex One thing I did learn from that article is that there have been more launches than I had thought. But, I'm still not convinced it has been a good investment for state money. Fine, let the Federales or private sources do it. Of what benefit will a study be? I see it as a wasted few hundred thousand to possibly millions that will do nothing except say: "Yeah, we want it". It would be cheaper to just pass a resolution saying the same thing. The money would be better spent on other things, such as strippers for the mayor. RE: Thoughts on Big Island Launch site ? - AlohaDave - 03-16-2016 quote:I think it's a great idea to stimulate the economy, but would like to see detailed location information as to where a debris field would occur in the event of an accident during or after launch and have the location situated so that it minimizes dangers to the population centers. RE: Thoughts on Big Island Launch site ? - Tink - 03-16-2016 Somehow I would think an area as large as the old Morse Field and surrounding area, based on how much land NASA has as launch and buffer at Cape Canaveral. Have bothe vertical, and standard runway take off with general path westerly, so the currents would bring back a water landing, crane haul back up similar to past operations. Community begins with Aloha RE: Thoughts on Big Island Launch site ? - kalakoa - 03-16-2016 The purpose of this Act is to appropriate moneys to conduct an economic assessment of the establishment of a small satellite launch and processing facility on the island of Hawaii. There's the economic stimulus. Safe bet that actual construction never happens, so other important issues (such as "where to put the debris field") aren't relevant. RE: Thoughts on Big Island Launch site ? - TomK - 03-16-2016 AlohaDave, "I think it's a great idea to stimulate the economy, but would like to see detailed location information as to where a debris field would occur in the event of an accident during or after launch and have the location situated so that it minimizes dangers to the population centers." Although I doubt a satellite launch site will ever be built in Hawaii, there is only one realistic area it could be built, and that's somewhere in Ka'u. There are two important considerations: 1) it would need to be built on the east coast and 2) it would need to be built in a remote area. 1) Satellite launches are always done to the east and if possible as near to the equator as possible. The rotation of the earth gives a boost to the launcher and satellites' velocity and so you want to launch on the east side of a land mass with plenty of ocean available if the rocket fails shortly after launch. Launching a rocket over a populated area is a big no no for obvious reasons. (The rotational speed of the earth is fastest at the equator hence the reason you want to be as close as possible to the equator). 2) The launch site itself has to be remote enough that a failure (read "explosion") on launch is contained within the launch site and does not affect a populated area. A remote area on the Ka'u coast is the only area I can think of on the island that might meet both these requirements. RE: Thoughts on Big Island Launch site ? - leilaniguy - 03-16-2016 So, we're back to the "Hawaiian Riviera Spaceport" of the 1990's? RE: Thoughts on Big Island Launch site ? - TomK - 03-16-2016 Leilaniguy - could you help me out? I'm not that familiar with the history of proposed space ports here so am not sure what you mean by "Hawaiian Riviera Spaceport". Thanks for any additional info or links you have. RE: Thoughts on Big Island Launch site ? - TomK - 03-16-2016 OK, I found this (it was before I arrived on the island): http://www.environment-hawaii.org/?p=3763 Is this what you were referring to? I've only given it a brief scan so far. RE: Thoughts on Big Island Launch site ? - AlohaDave - 03-16-2016 To those that believe there would be no economic stimulus: Beyond Construction.... Consider each employee hired and the amount they spend each year with local businesses and the taxes they pay to support local government. Then of course, consider the tourism factor. People like to watch spacecraft lift-off. if marketed properly it could be a real boon to the local economy |