"Super-Aged" population a challenge for Hawaii

[TomK]

"One party can't win unless they stifle the vote.. seriously, when was the last time the repugs won a fair election? Not in our lifetime. The idiots couldn't win for dog catcher without a bunch of pilikia..

So again.. why do we let them participate in civil society? They are uneducated losers who impose their twisted sick morals by criminalizing everyone that doesn't lick their god's ass."

It's hard to bring this back to Hawaii, but I know many intelligent people educated in Hawaii have gone on to make a difference in the US. Yet it seems that if you have a different political opinion from MyManao, you shouldn't be allowed to participate in civil society and should be culled and sterilized.  Although I disagree with how things are going, the solution is not the one used in 1930s Europe.

[Durian Fiend]

Methinks, no one over 65, at the time of being sworn in for office, should be qualified to be a political candidate..

Like I said, create an emeritus status for old advisers, but stop with the notion of politicians being viable into old age.. we don't let anyone else go on like that.. why should we our political leaders?

What on earth are you talking about? First, it was sterilizing a particular group of people; now you're hinting we should cull people of a certain age.

He meant an age limit for the job, not euthanasia beyond that point!  

I'm afraid that the demographic trend won't allow us to be so picky in most cases.  Commercial airline pilots age out at 65 and that's probably a good thing.  Can anyone think of other professions they would prefer not to see a geezer working in?

I know what he meant. I wasn't talking about euthanasia, either. One definition of cull is "something rejected especially as being inferior or worthless," e.g., https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cull. Putting that together with wanting to sterilize a bunch of US citizens who have different views from him leaves one with the impression that he supports some very extreme beliefs. Do I have to mention again that he wants thieves hanged? Pilots having to retire at 65 is a complete red herring.  Reaching that age doesn't mean your mind breaks down; it's an arbitrary limit.

Pilots having to retire at 65 is not a red herring. Of course it's arbitrary, based on the typical physical and mental decline expected as a person ages.

Hawaii judges are required to retire by age 70, another arbitrary age limit.  IMO, politicians should also have that restriction.

As for his wish to sterilize a certain demographic,  I believe that falls under the category of "hyperbole".  Using this term emphasizes disgust with their actions.  
OTOH, it could be a actual fantasy of his.  If running for office, it's doubtful he'd include it in his campaign platform. 

[MyManao]

As for his wish to sterilize a certain demographic,  I believe that falls under the category of "hyperbole".  Using this term emphasizes disgust with their actions.

Ah, yes, but Tom doesn't "believe" in hyperbole.. and omg I could go on about what he does.. but this is a family oriented website.. and we stretch that PG rating enough as it is. 

As to those genes.. yep, I am of the mind, always have been, that we, the good ol' USA, really screwed up making a deal with slave owners.. our freedom from King George was not worth crawling in bed with the devil, we could have gotten free another way.

Then Abe stepped in and compounded the mistake with his starry eyed dreams of Reconstruction. What a mess.. we allow the losers of the ugliest war in history to walk.. it was a joke, right? 

And look.. we're now saddled with hate coursing through our veins.. with the desire to turn our neighbors into criminals because we don't like the color of their hair. Literally who cares who's loving who? It's none of our business, and yet we are now in the throws of legislating, or by our king's decree, the criminalization of our societal norms. In other words we're out of our fucking minds.

So yeah.. those who rose from the concepts of slavery, the repugs, are sick underdeveloped parasitic worms that don't belong in a mature society. They are morons, their babies are a threat to our very lives. And when we consider the possible outcomes of climate change.. the very existence of life on Earth.

So.. hyperbole.. it's an apt term.. though our wannabe is too consumed with his own importance to have any idea what we're talking about.

As to where all this is going.. I am hopeful it leads to an independent Hawaii. That through all the twists and turns of our country's downfall the desire for sovereignty forms and together, natives and haoles alike, we see the wisdom in becoming independent from uncle and chart a future free of the burden of America's insanity. In other words, living in a independent and free Hawaiian nation becomes preferable over being a slave state to the jokers to our East.

[randomq]

We could be independent of the US? Would our GDP be enough to support our basic needs? What percent of it would we spend on military to keep us independent? Who will the ruling class be?

[TomK]

As for his wish to sterilize a certain demographic,  I believe that falls under the category of "hyperbole".  Using this term emphasizes disgust with their actions.

Ah, yes, but Tom doesn't "believe" in hyperbole.. and omg I could go on about what he does.. but this is a family oriented website.. and we stretch that PG rating enough as it is. 

As to those genes.. yep, I am of the mind, always have been, that we, the good ol' USA, really screwed up making a deal with slave owners.. our freedom from King George was not worth crawling in bed with the devil, we could have gotten free another way.

Then Abe stepped in and compounded the mistake with his starry eyed dreams of Reconstruction. What a mess.. we allow the losers of the ugliest war in history to walk.. it was a joke, right? 

And look.. we're now saddled with hate coursing through our veins.. with the desire to turn our neighbors into criminals because we don't like the color of their hair. Literally who cares who's loving who? It's none of our business, and yet we are now in the throws of legislating, or by our king's decree, the criminalization of our societal norms. In other words we're out of our fucking minds.

So yeah.. those who rose from the concepts of slavery, the repugs, are sick underdeveloped parasitic worms that don't belong in a mature society. They are morons, their babies are a threat to our very lives. And when we consider the possible outcomes of climate change.. the very existence of life on Earth.

So.. hyperbole.. it's an apt term.. though our wannabe is too consumed with his own importance to have any idea what we're talking about.

As to where all this is going.. I am hopeful it leads to an independent Hawaii. That through all the twists and turns of our country's downfall the desire for sovereignty forms and together, natives and haoles alike, we see the wisdom in becoming independent from uncle and chart a future free of the burden of America's insanity. In other words, living in a independent and free Hawaiian nation becomes preferable over being a slave state to the jokers to our East.

I must quote this because it's such a disturbing, entertaining, and meaningless rant. Well done! I might add that it starts with a straw man—a rather unpleasant one with no evidence provided—and then moves into some bizarre conspiracy. And I didn't even mention "hyperbole."

---

PS. "Ah, yes, but Tom doesn't "believe" in hyperbole.. and omg I could go on about what he does"

You have my permission to post about what I do. I'm interested in your claims and how you will go on about what I do. Given your history, I suspect we'll see nothing, but please feel free to post about what I do. However, I expect you to provide evidence if you respond.

[TomK]

I'm still waiting.