There could be several reasons, but yes, one of them is that the observatories can shelter each other depending on the wind direction and they can also vignette their own anemometer (there are strict rules about where you can place things at the summit). Also, the summit ridge telescopes are more exposed compared to the Kecks and Subaru and especially those in Submm Valley (JCMT and the SMA). Then you might also have anemometers icing up due to severe icing conditions. It's rare but has happened.
The most reliable sites tend to be UKIRT and the CFHT. Unfortunately, UKIRT isn't able to provide data to the MKWC right now (I'm trying to get that fixed) but CFHT data tend to be very reliable. Right now winds are approaching 100 mph and increasing. Ice and snow are being detected automatically (there's no one at the summit in these conditions, at least I hope not).
PS. I just looked at our weather data and UKIRT's wind speed measurements are closely following those monitored by the CFHT except they are about 20 mph lower. The wind is from the SW which probably means that the UKIRT dome is vignetting its own anemometer, hence the lower speeds. The CFHT anemometer is displaced enough to the west that it's seeing the wind full-on.
The most reliable sites tend to be UKIRT and the CFHT. Unfortunately, UKIRT isn't able to provide data to the MKWC right now (I'm trying to get that fixed) but CFHT data tend to be very reliable. Right now winds are approaching 100 mph and increasing. Ice and snow are being detected automatically (there's no one at the summit in these conditions, at least I hope not).
PS. I just looked at our weather data and UKIRT's wind speed measurements are closely following those monitored by the CFHT except they are about 20 mph lower. The wind is from the SW which probably means that the UKIRT dome is vignetting its own anemometer, hence the lower speeds. The CFHT anemometer is displaced enough to the west that it's seeing the wind full-on.