11-18-2010, 03:27 AM
I attended the meeting. There was consistent support for a park from the members. Some fence mending took place as Park Committee members had been alarmed by an HTH article which said that support for the park was waning on the board. This was not so according to the BoD. What was happening was that the BoD wanted to proceed carefully and concisely with the details.
After discussion the Park Proposal was tabled until the next meeting to allow for further research and communication with the county.
HPPOA is proceeding in an intelligent and thoughtful way.
I will add that the administration has back tracked a bit from its earlier presentation. CoH is willing to have the deed of the land revocable if work does not commence on the park within two years. So the definition of "work commence" has the attention of the BoD. "Does this mean knocking down three trees?" asked one board member? There are rational questions which need to be resolved in negotiation with the county.
After discussion the Park Proposal was tabled until the next meeting to allow for further research and communication with the county.
HPPOA is proceeding in an intelligent and thoughtful way.
I will add that the administration has back tracked a bit from its earlier presentation. CoH is willing to have the deed of the land revocable if work does not commence on the park within two years. So the definition of "work commence" has the attention of the BoD. "Does this mean knocking down three trees?" asked one board member? There are rational questions which need to be resolved in negotiation with the county.
Assume the best and ask questions.
Punaweb moderator
Punaweb moderator