Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
CDPs again
#5


Any effort will have to be in spite of the Council (and County, and State), they've managed to do basically nothing for decades.

It's long past time County stopped pretending that Planning isn't "by the developers, for the developers". If they could at least be honest, I might find some respect for them. Instead, "they" keep pretending that building codes are somehow important while the complete lack of infrastructure is "too big a problem to fix".

If forming a PUD means you can circumvent zoning/planning/codes, great, let's form a PUD that allows shacks -- they're already "allowing" it (because they "don't have resources" to enforce), so nobody's "losing" anything. In fact, it would save money on pointless enforcement.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
CDPs again - by kalakoa - 07-24-2013, 03:10 AM
RE: CDPs again - by rainyjim - 07-24-2013, 04:03 PM
RE: CDPs again - by kalakoa - 07-25-2013, 02:34 AM
RE: CDPs again - by rainyjim - 07-25-2013, 10:32 AM
RE: CDPs again - by kalakoa - 07-25-2013, 10:56 AM
RE: CDPs again - by chal4oye - 01-14-2014, 05:47 PM
RE: CDPs again - by pahoated - 03-03-2014, 04:41 AM
RE: CDPs again - by kalakoa - 03-03-2014, 04:48 AM
RE: CDPs again - by Rob Tucker - 03-03-2014, 07:19 AM
RE: CDPs again - by kalakoa - 03-03-2014, 09:31 AM
RE: CDPs again - by Rob Tucker - 03-03-2014, 09:42 AM
RE: CDPs again - by Chunkster - 03-04-2014, 03:29 AM
RE: CDPs again - by Hapahaole - 06-02-2014, 05:46 AM
RE: CDPs again - by kalakoa - 06-02-2014, 07:55 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)