02-16-2014, 02:48 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Haaheo okole puka
PaulW,
Somewhat off topic but still within the concern of the ethics regarding the current "scientific consensus" (ideology) state of GM food.
Here we see the "scientific consensus" (ideology) of global warming called to the mat.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesd...long-life/
II A - Practice leads to being well regulated (in an ideal state, properly functioning) and armed citizens provide security of a free state - thus the already existing natural right to keep and carry arms shall not be infringed.
What you are seeing is a man nearing 90 years old complaining about ClimateGate - something that has been hashed out in both the press and the scientific community ad nauseum. He seems to think 'big money' is behind climate change research. It would seem to me to be quite the opposite, with big oil in particular, with their uncounted billions available to lobby for climate change research to be suppressed. Interestingly, the 'creation scientists' have a similar theory about evolution and the 6 billion year old world being a fraud perpetrated to discredit the bible. When you start thinking conspiracy theory, it's time for the tin foil hats to come out.
Me ka ha`aha`a,
Mike
Mike