08-25-2014, 10:06 AM
We got a post card too, so it had to have been mailed by either HPPOA or someone who had access to the mailing list.
I do think that the board is going to have to learn to listen to the members first, before members are able to come up with solutions. As long as the board refuses to allow members to speak to them (telling members to "shut up" in one case) and respond defensively when they do (as at the first meeting after the firings), rather than acknowledging that they may have something to learn from the membership, we are not going to get anywhere without a recall of the board.
I found it ironic that the board member who posted a letter on the HPPOA website defended not allowing members to speak at the last meeting by quoting the bylaws, but the board doesn't seem to think it is important that they follow the bylaws. You can't pick and choose which rules to follow, and the board COULD have allowed members to speak at the last meeting, they just chose not to. It would have cost them nothing to listen to what the members had to say, except time, and it might have helped heal the rift between the board and the membership. That was the same board member who said she will not respond to emails unless they are "polite" which seems to be defined as any email that disagrees with her. I sent a perfectly civil request for a timeline on the board's past actions and did not receive any response.
Carol
Not my circus, not my monkeys.
I do think that the board is going to have to learn to listen to the members first, before members are able to come up with solutions. As long as the board refuses to allow members to speak to them (telling members to "shut up" in one case) and respond defensively when they do (as at the first meeting after the firings), rather than acknowledging that they may have something to learn from the membership, we are not going to get anywhere without a recall of the board.
I found it ironic that the board member who posted a letter on the HPPOA website defended not allowing members to speak at the last meeting by quoting the bylaws, but the board doesn't seem to think it is important that they follow the bylaws. You can't pick and choose which rules to follow, and the board COULD have allowed members to speak at the last meeting, they just chose not to. It would have cost them nothing to listen to what the members had to say, except time, and it might have helped heal the rift between the board and the membership. That was the same board member who said she will not respond to emails unless they are "polite" which seems to be defined as any email that disagrees with her. I sent a perfectly civil request for a timeline on the board's past actions and did not receive any response.
Carol
Not my circus, not my monkeys.
Carol
Every time you feel yourself getting pulled into other people's nonsense, repeat these words: Not my circus, not my monkeys.
Polish Proverb
Every time you feel yourself getting pulled into other people's nonsense, repeat these words: Not my circus, not my monkeys.
Polish Proverb