10-31-2014, 05:44 AM
of no more value than an introductory passage
It is, in fact, part of the introduction; geological risk is not mentioned elsewhere.
Just below this introductory passage is a map that shows Pahoa in LF2, right up against the edge of LF1.
Much of the Plan seems to focus on preservation of native forest, historic/cultural/scenic resources, geological features, aquifers, coastal waters ... managing growth (including "selective rezoning" and "floating zone for joint-use mixed development") ... where the regional/community/neighborhood "village centers" should go and how the permit process can facilitate this ... agricultural tourism, development of "green industry" ...
No contingency plans.
Unless you include the part about County keeping foreclosed properties rather than selling them at the tax auction, in order to "Protect unknown natural and cultural sites or features" (the lava flow being both "unknown" and a "natural feature").
It is, in fact, part of the introduction; geological risk is not mentioned elsewhere.
Just below this introductory passage is a map that shows Pahoa in LF2, right up against the edge of LF1.
Much of the Plan seems to focus on preservation of native forest, historic/cultural/scenic resources, geological features, aquifers, coastal waters ... managing growth (including "selective rezoning" and "floating zone for joint-use mixed development") ... where the regional/community/neighborhood "village centers" should go and how the permit process can facilitate this ... agricultural tourism, development of "green industry" ...
No contingency plans.
Unless you include the part about County keeping foreclosed properties rather than selling them at the tax auction, in order to "Protect unknown natural and cultural sites or features" (the lava flow being both "unknown" and a "natural feature").