03-23-2015, 12:24 PM
The reasoning stood, that should these subdivisions reach build-out, the county could go bankrupt providing the required infrastructure.
I can hardly wait for the expensive lawsuit that forces the issue of "required infrastructure".
Thus far, County simply claims "no services for private subdivisions" (not "public") while also requiring permits ("in the County") and writing traffic tickets ("it's a through road").
I think it's past time that this was settled one way or the other.
I can hardly wait for the expensive lawsuit that forces the issue of "required infrastructure".
Thus far, County simply claims "no services for private subdivisions" (not "public") while also requiring permits ("in the County") and writing traffic tickets ("it's a through road").
I think it's past time that this was settled one way or the other.