05-28-2015, 02:57 AM
The workplace uses "or equivalent experience" all the time
If, in fact, the law indicated that equivalent experience was acceptable, I would have zero argument with Leithead-Todd's appointment to the position.
County has shown itself unwilling/unable to "waive the technicality" as it applies to interpretation of the building code, because "rules and laws are for everyone".
Apparently the rule of law is not universal or guaranteed. Act surprised. (Later, when the inspector comes, I'll explain that my construction is "substantially similar" to the Code as written, let's see how far I get with that.)
If, in fact, the law indicated that equivalent experience was acceptable, I would have zero argument with Leithead-Todd's appointment to the position.
County has shown itself unwilling/unable to "waive the technicality" as it applies to interpretation of the building code, because "rules and laws are for everyone".
Apparently the rule of law is not universal or guaranteed. Act surprised. (Later, when the inspector comes, I'll explain that my construction is "substantially similar" to the Code as written, let's see how far I get with that.)