06-25-2015, 02:16 AM
Do any of the last 3 posters own in HPP? Doesn't seem like it...
HPP engages in extensive public airing of its dirty diapers; I take this as license to snark.
That said ... (and I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong), it seems to me that of the Puna subdivisions, HPP has
- the most lots
- highest occupancy
- fastest growth rate
- more owner participation
- a budget of over $2M/year
For these reasons (and others) I am hoping HPP can lead by example -- and if it were located almost anywhere but Puna, this would probably happen.
With a multi-million-dollar budget, it should be cheaper to hire lobbyists and seek County/State subsidies, or cut to the chase and sue County for waiving the "developer must pave roads prior to final subdivision plat approval" rule (which should apply "equally" and "to everyone").
What does HPP do with the money instead?
If the residents/owners in HPP really don't want comments from a peanut gallery of unwashed non-resident/non-owners, perhaps they should find a more private venue for their poop-flinging. Better yet, do something positive (like the aforementioned lawsuit against County) so the rest of us can make helpful suggestions, or possibly join our subdivisions to the big lawsuit.
Ironically, it seems noteworthy that HPPOA is not being sanctioned by County for their illegal acts -- if, in fact, there are boulders in the road, these require an encroachment permit from County -- and don't say "but it's a private road" because County has already granted itself juridsiction thereof via Code section 24-1, and is thereby creating a textbook example of "selective enforcement" if nothing is done.
HPP engages in extensive public airing of its dirty diapers; I take this as license to snark.
That said ... (and I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong), it seems to me that of the Puna subdivisions, HPP has
- the most lots
- highest occupancy
- fastest growth rate
- more owner participation
- a budget of over $2M/year
For these reasons (and others) I am hoping HPP can lead by example -- and if it were located almost anywhere but Puna, this would probably happen.
With a multi-million-dollar budget, it should be cheaper to hire lobbyists and seek County/State subsidies, or cut to the chase and sue County for waiving the "developer must pave roads prior to final subdivision plat approval" rule (which should apply "equally" and "to everyone").
What does HPP do with the money instead?
If the residents/owners in HPP really don't want comments from a peanut gallery of unwashed non-resident/non-owners, perhaps they should find a more private venue for their poop-flinging. Better yet, do something positive (like the aforementioned lawsuit against County) so the rest of us can make helpful suggestions, or possibly join our subdivisions to the big lawsuit.
Ironically, it seems noteworthy that HPPOA is not being sanctioned by County for their illegal acts -- if, in fact, there are boulders in the road, these require an encroachment permit from County -- and don't say "but it's a private road" because County has already granted itself juridsiction thereof via Code section 24-1, and is thereby creating a textbook example of "selective enforcement" if nothing is done.