07-23-2015, 04:56 PM
"mermaid53: Posted - 07/23/2015
...What intelligent people in their right minds while serving on a board, make any kind of decisions based on "hearsay information that was not true" as you claim?..."
Running back over the sequence of events last year:
(1) The Board was installed on 30 June.
(2) I was told last summer by one of the four former office staff (and not Kahunascott) that, between that date and the terminations on 18 July, the only Board member who visited the HPPOA office was the Vice President, accompanied by Susan Escobar - who met with the staff and discussed office procedures. Not one Board member examined any files (personnel, financial, etc.) before the employees were terminated.
In the letter posted on the HPPOA website in January 2015, the former President, Ms.Mullenix, referring to the terminations, asserted that the Board had to act fast to protect the Association's assets. If no Board member had examined the files, how did the Board know the assets were in danger?
...What intelligent people in their right minds while serving on a board, make any kind of decisions based on "hearsay information that was not true" as you claim?..."
Running back over the sequence of events last year:
(1) The Board was installed on 30 June.
(2) I was told last summer by one of the four former office staff (and not Kahunascott) that, between that date and the terminations on 18 July, the only Board member who visited the HPPOA office was the Vice President, accompanied by Susan Escobar - who met with the staff and discussed office procedures. Not one Board member examined any files (personnel, financial, etc.) before the employees were terminated.
In the letter posted on the HPPOA website in January 2015, the former President, Ms.Mullenix, referring to the terminations, asserted that the Board had to act fast to protect the Association's assets. If no Board member had examined the files, how did the Board know the assets were in danger?