08-02-2015, 06:13 PM
TomK, your recent post again shows your level of professionalism.
Read over 100 pages of that report now, not impressed to this point. The report brings a limited amount of information to the reader, also the report makes an overall minimal impact on the public trust issues. Not sure why so many paragraphs are crossed out of the final report but it does not help it look complete. The hand picked public that was sent letters and questioners regarding the TMT process, smells like a fishy process. The rarely mentioned public input and several lightly attended public meetings made little to no impact on the above mentioned TMT project.
Joking aside Tomk, although I have only read a third of the report it looks and reads very one sided(TMT)to this point. Does not look like much time was spent considering other locations. The many Mentions of site E or Chile does not show any other consideration DATA?
Read over 100 pages of that report now, not impressed to this point. The report brings a limited amount of information to the reader, also the report makes an overall minimal impact on the public trust issues. Not sure why so many paragraphs are crossed out of the final report but it does not help it look complete. The hand picked public that was sent letters and questioners regarding the TMT process, smells like a fishy process. The rarely mentioned public input and several lightly attended public meetings made little to no impact on the above mentioned TMT project.
Joking aside Tomk, although I have only read a third of the report it looks and reads very one sided(TMT)to this point. Does not look like much time was spent considering other locations. The many Mentions of site E or Chile does not show any other consideration DATA?