It's important to add this to this thread.
The animal control component of this Orchidland animal shelter is funded by the county. It's a county tax-payer funded service with a law enforcement component, directing traffic onto privately-owned roads, where the property owners of the subdivision assume liability coverage and all the maintenance cost of the roads damaged by the traffic the county is generating.
Shouldn't county services be located on publicly maintained roads? Otherwise, OLE residents have to pay taxes for a service most don't use, and also pay for the infrastructure and insurance to support it? That's kind of a kick to the teeth. The county should pave and maintain the roads to the shelter they are funding.
The animal control component of this Orchidland animal shelter is funded by the county. It's a county tax-payer funded service with a law enforcement component, directing traffic onto privately-owned roads, where the property owners of the subdivision assume liability coverage and all the maintenance cost of the roads damaged by the traffic the county is generating.
Shouldn't county services be located on publicly maintained roads? Otherwise, OLE residents have to pay taxes for a service most don't use, and also pay for the infrastructure and insurance to support it? That's kind of a kick to the teeth. The county should pave and maintain the roads to the shelter they are funding.