11-09-2022, 08:59 AM
(11-09-2022, 08:31 AM)TomK Wrote:"Considering how tainted the science has been over the past couple years, I dont see any harm in promoting his paper. At least nobody will die from it. And its quite well written. So its certainly convincing from that standpoint."(11-08-2022, 03:19 PM)kander Wrote: is that British sarcasm while explaining the sarcastic points of my post while interjecting a dig at my mastery of English? Psst, here's an idea.
What? I didn't explain the sarcasm in your post; there wasn't any. And seriously, are you claiming to have mastery of the English language? The quote above shows you haven't.
ergo;
"There would certainly be harm in promoting the paper, it would mean pseudo-science would become acceptable, and promoting such a paper would be unethical if it were done by a scientist."
~never have a battle of wits with an unarmed person. - Sam Clemens