12-10-2022, 11:48 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-11-2022, 12:35 AM by HereOnThePrimalEdge.)
While a report in 2020 recommended aligning land use and development with the USGS lava zones,
This was brought up by a call-in questioner on one of the first days of the eruption when Mitch Roth, Ken Hon, etc were fielding questions from the public & media. The caller wanted to know if any findings from the report applied to Mauna Loa. The subject was quickly changed and avoided.
those living and working in low numbered lava zones might want to stop and consider if you actually want this recommendation to be followed)
I don't believe the recommendations in the $2 million dollar report are something government officials wish to discuss during an ongoing eruption, or probably afterwards either. In this instance, "move along, nothing to see here" is probably mutually beneficial.
This was brought up by a call-in questioner on one of the first days of the eruption when Mitch Roth, Ken Hon, etc were fielding questions from the public & media. The caller wanted to know if any findings from the report applied to Mauna Loa. The subject was quickly changed and avoided.
those living and working in low numbered lava zones might want to stop and consider if you actually want this recommendation to be followed)
I don't believe the recommendations in the $2 million dollar report are something government officials wish to discuss during an ongoing eruption, or probably afterwards either. In this instance, "move along, nothing to see here" is probably mutually beneficial.