03-22-2025, 08:47 AM
From MyManao:
"I am confused. Nobody said anything about the diurnal causing eruptions, so why would there be an explanation for it doing so? "
Post #56
"I find it interesting.. and wonder.. does that change in tilt that happens because of the heating and cooling of the atmosphere actually account for more magma to flow, and if so then the total tilt over time as plotted is directly tied to magma accumulation regardless of the atmospheric contribution? Or, is that illusionary in that there is no increase in flow and as such the overall amount of magma accumulating, or more specifically ground tilting, is less than the end point of the tilt plot suggests? In other words, do we have to subtract all that atmospheric activity to get a true sense of how much magma is accumulating over time?"
Post #62
"As to whether this all could mean there's a corresponding increase in the influx of magma, verses those steps are purely atmospheric, that’s getting down in the weeds. Is the expansion of the rock asymmetrical and as such is it somehow creating a larger void space below it that is hydraulically responded to? Or, is the pressure of the rock’s expansion down as much as it is up? I lean more to the later, and as such speak in terms of chopping off the steps, subtracting them from the total, rather than taking the overall rate of change at face value."
Then there was an intermission about telescopes detecting shore break. That was just pure distraction.
I tried to start discussing this topic with you, I was interested to see if you could actually maintain a scientific discussion, but no, that ditn't happen:
Post #74
"You're asking questions that suggest you have no idea what you are talking about. My work? Dude, I asked a question. I didn't do any work, have nothing to show. Never said I did. All I am doing is playing around with an idea.. a simple one. Hydraulics, open system verses closed. Simple. But we never got that far.. because you can not comprehend the meaning of the things you read.
And to think you call yourself a scientist.. and expect others to believe you."
Then there's post #82
"I am sorry Tom, it has gotten, if not impossible, extremely hard to bat around ideas with you anymore. As if it ever was easy.. considering how one sided your approach to reality is. How everything has to be to your way of thinking otherwise it is wrong. It’s always been that way.. which is why I have, through the years, pointing out that scientists are people that view the world objectively, and to call oneself a scientist one has to demonstrate objective reasoning, and you have always struggled with that. Here, at least, you’re always, seemingly, been led around by your emotions, by your likes and dislikes. You never have demonstrated objectivity in discourse here, ever. You may have objectivity when observing a star.. but never here. With starlight, sure, with people, not so much. And you have never been able to grok simple physics as it applies to the workings of Earth's structures. I am sorry, you’ve always missed that mark.
Again, you may know the nuances of starlight, but otherwise, you have not shown an appreciation for the more mundane Earth sciences, or impartiality in general. In reality, overall, you’re just another person, a bully in fact. A person that brags about himself but otherwise is mean to anyone that threatens their sense of their own superiority.
So, please, accept my condolences.. and stop embarrassing yourself. It’s time to put it out to pasture. Tell us how your day’s going, howz the family, the pets, share a published article on some obscure star system and what the real researchers are gleaming from its light. But you gotta recognize when I say white and you insist I said black, and insist over and over again, it’s time to find another pastime.. proving your superiority to us isn’t working anymore. As if it ever did. But hey, you’ve had a good run at trying, and now it’s time to give it up. Find another hobby. Being nice, encouraging others, maybe that's the ticket. Who knows, but hey, you might as well give it a try, right?"
And finally, post #84
"I've been trying.. but god knows our wannabe 'scientist' has been giving us all a lesson in senility that has, again, overwhelmed the thread.. but hey I'll try and recap.. "
"I am confused. Nobody said anything about the diurnal causing eruptions, so why would there be an explanation for it doing so? "
Post #56
"I find it interesting.. and wonder.. does that change in tilt that happens because of the heating and cooling of the atmosphere actually account for more magma to flow, and if so then the total tilt over time as plotted is directly tied to magma accumulation regardless of the atmospheric contribution? Or, is that illusionary in that there is no increase in flow and as such the overall amount of magma accumulating, or more specifically ground tilting, is less than the end point of the tilt plot suggests? In other words, do we have to subtract all that atmospheric activity to get a true sense of how much magma is accumulating over time?"
Post #62
"As to whether this all could mean there's a corresponding increase in the influx of magma, verses those steps are purely atmospheric, that’s getting down in the weeds. Is the expansion of the rock asymmetrical and as such is it somehow creating a larger void space below it that is hydraulically responded to? Or, is the pressure of the rock’s expansion down as much as it is up? I lean more to the later, and as such speak in terms of chopping off the steps, subtracting them from the total, rather than taking the overall rate of change at face value."
Then there was an intermission about telescopes detecting shore break. That was just pure distraction.
I tried to start discussing this topic with you, I was interested to see if you could actually maintain a scientific discussion, but no, that ditn't happen:
Post #74
"You're asking questions that suggest you have no idea what you are talking about. My work? Dude, I asked a question. I didn't do any work, have nothing to show. Never said I did. All I am doing is playing around with an idea.. a simple one. Hydraulics, open system verses closed. Simple. But we never got that far.. because you can not comprehend the meaning of the things you read.
And to think you call yourself a scientist.. and expect others to believe you."
Then there's post #82
"I am sorry Tom, it has gotten, if not impossible, extremely hard to bat around ideas with you anymore. As if it ever was easy.. considering how one sided your approach to reality is. How everything has to be to your way of thinking otherwise it is wrong. It’s always been that way.. which is why I have, through the years, pointing out that scientists are people that view the world objectively, and to call oneself a scientist one has to demonstrate objective reasoning, and you have always struggled with that. Here, at least, you’re always, seemingly, been led around by your emotions, by your likes and dislikes. You never have demonstrated objectivity in discourse here, ever. You may have objectivity when observing a star.. but never here. With starlight, sure, with people, not so much. And you have never been able to grok simple physics as it applies to the workings of Earth's structures. I am sorry, you’ve always missed that mark.
Again, you may know the nuances of starlight, but otherwise, you have not shown an appreciation for the more mundane Earth sciences, or impartiality in general. In reality, overall, you’re just another person, a bully in fact. A person that brags about himself but otherwise is mean to anyone that threatens their sense of their own superiority.
So, please, accept my condolences.. and stop embarrassing yourself. It’s time to put it out to pasture. Tell us how your day’s going, howz the family, the pets, share a published article on some obscure star system and what the real researchers are gleaming from its light. But you gotta recognize when I say white and you insist I said black, and insist over and over again, it’s time to find another pastime.. proving your superiority to us isn’t working anymore. As if it ever did. But hey, you’ve had a good run at trying, and now it’s time to give it up. Find another hobby. Being nice, encouraging others, maybe that's the ticket. Who knows, but hey, you might as well give it a try, right?"
And finally, post #84
"I've been trying.. but god knows our wannabe 'scientist' has been giving us all a lesson in senility that has, again, overwhelmed the thread.. but hey I'll try and recap.. "