05-11-2025, 06:01 PM
"As lawyer, are you represented that being "generally subject to" is the same thing as having a "right"? "
In this context of the law, yes, it is a right.
"Can you also please help me with "(to the extent permitted by statute) "? "
By the terms outlined in any statute as it applies to any subject matter.
"What statute applies?"
Its The Constitution of the United States. And various Acts, in this case, the Immigration and Nationality Act. And various SCOTUS rulings.
Were you on Punaweb in 2009?
No. Where you? But having said that, imagine where we would be if Hawaii's "Favorite Son" mulled the suspension of Habeas Corpus in 2009. Or claimed he did not know if he had to uphold the Constitution of the United States.
Continue the gaslighting PTangy! You seemingly are quite full of it!
In this context of the law, yes, it is a right.
"Can you also please help me with "(to the extent permitted by statute) "? "
By the terms outlined in any statute as it applies to any subject matter.
"What statute applies?"
Its The Constitution of the United States. And various Acts, in this case, the Immigration and Nationality Act. And various SCOTUS rulings.
Were you on Punaweb in 2009?
No. Where you? But having said that, imagine where we would be if Hawaii's "Favorite Son" mulled the suspension of Habeas Corpus in 2009. Or claimed he did not know if he had to uphold the Constitution of the United States.
Continue the gaslighting PTangy! You seemingly are quite full of it!