05-27-2025, 06:42 PM
(05-27-2025, 06:16 PM)Punatang Wrote:(05-27-2025, 06:14 PM)Moderator 2 Wrote: If you think that every action or idea by X is bad and every action or idea by Y is good, you have a problem.
I believe it’s been noted that Hawaii Gov Green suggested that all elderly presidential office holders should undergo legitimate impartial health checks. Not just X but Y as well.
Yes and Y actually gets (and reports them). That's how it's supposed to be done.
According to Dr. William Dahut of the American Cancer Society, “We would anticipate he has had prostate cancer many, many years”
I suggest you google which candidates released their medical records during the 2024 campaign and which one did not.
A friend of mine was recently diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. Similar story to the above, doctors believe it has been festering for years.
Some wealthy people spend thousands each year for extensive testing in order to catch something like this.
And yes, there's no excuse for POTUS not to be tested for prostate cancer, even if guidelines suggest it's not necessary for a man his age.

