06-02-2025, 09:25 PM
Look, the problem with the Hubble HST) is that the data it collects are public, and you can check to see what it has observed after the proprietary period of a year after the data were taken. That year-long period is intended to allow scientists to use the data for their own research, as they were the ones who made the case for using the telescope.
The next issue is that the HST is not capable of observing stuff on the Earth's surface, nor is it capable of observing spy satellites in LEO. It simply can't do it; it's physically impossible for it to do so. Now, after all that, how would the military want to use the HST? What possible purpose could they use it for? No one can answer that question because it's not what the HST does.
I realize conspiracy theorists take a lack of information or data as something must be going on, but in this case, it's simple physics. What military purpose can the HST be used for? Looking at Russian bases on Mars? No one is coming up with an argument that comes close to explaining how the military could use the HST.
The next issue is that the HST is not capable of observing stuff on the Earth's surface, nor is it capable of observing spy satellites in LEO. It simply can't do it; it's physically impossible for it to do so. Now, after all that, how would the military want to use the HST? What possible purpose could they use it for? No one can answer that question because it's not what the HST does.
I realize conspiracy theorists take a lack of information or data as something must be going on, but in this case, it's simple physics. What military purpose can the HST be used for? Looking at Russian bases on Mars? No one is coming up with an argument that comes close to explaining how the military could use the HST.