Edge, when a moderator attacks you with this...
"So you didn’t want answers to your questions?
You just wanted to argue for three pages?"
...when you are the only one in the thread not arguing, simply because they are rattled by the obvious truth, it is a lack of neutrality.
Post #1 - Page #1 I agree with Julie and I agree with Durian Fiend. I could continue but that's enough to 100% conclusively prove the point. The moderator's attack on me is demonstrably untrue but I'm sure they felt it was true because they are incapable of neutrality and, for that reason, unfit to be a mod in my opinion. Making a friendly point, that a moderator disagrees with, is not "arguing", except these days, on Punaweb.
"So you didn’t want answers to your questions?
You just wanted to argue for three pages?"
...when you are the only one in the thread not arguing, simply because they are rattled by the obvious truth, it is a lack of neutrality.
Post #1 - Page #1 I agree with Julie and I agree with Durian Fiend. I could continue but that's enough to 100% conclusively prove the point. The moderator's attack on me is demonstrably untrue but I'm sure they felt it was true because they are incapable of neutrality and, for that reason, unfit to be a mod in my opinion. Making a friendly point, that a moderator disagrees with, is not "arguing", except these days, on Punaweb.
"If we are too precise we will be called out because we cannot back it with data."- A.F.

