04-02-2026, 09:49 PM
I am amazed that by me saying :
"...and while some local Telcom companies may have provided the old Code Red with their subscriber base for LAND LINES only, Hawaiian Telcom did not and does not for the new Code Red. Further, no cellular company provided the old Code Red or provides the new Code Red with subscriber information."
(pertinent information core to the conversation has been made bold and underlined, with critically core information presented in a larger font)
equals anything you said is what's beyond comprehension. I don't think that sentence can be any clearer as to what I said. In the oft chance it was not clear enough for you, I am discussing how they may have gotten your number, of which we now know as you did indeed subscribe. I would also suggest that it may be prudent for you to notify your local Austin Emergency Officials of the call you experienced.
I made my first reply as possible information as to why you got called and the issue you said happened. How any of this gets turned into my "...immense propensity to always have the last answer" escapes any reasonable logic, as well as the "You lose" comment, which, besides you, thinks communication is a contest with a winner and a loser? I think Rob has made mention of this very thing several times.
As for the comment, "Why you have not been banned is beyond comprehension" I have no comment.
And then as for "The vast majority of your posts are combative" how has my posts in this thread been considered "combative," even considering this response, and in comparison, to yours?
I think it should also be noted that since the November 2025 hack, numerous counties and cities are moving away from using Code Red to other providers.
But at any event, to keep PunaWeb peace and harmony, and boost your fragile male ego, I'll say you won!
"...and while some local Telcom companies may have provided the old Code Red with their subscriber base for LAND LINES only, Hawaiian Telcom did not and does not for the new Code Red. Further, no cellular company provided the old Code Red or provides the new Code Red with subscriber information."
(pertinent information core to the conversation has been made bold and underlined, with critically core information presented in a larger font)
equals anything you said is what's beyond comprehension. I don't think that sentence can be any clearer as to what I said. In the oft chance it was not clear enough for you, I am discussing how they may have gotten your number, of which we now know as you did indeed subscribe. I would also suggest that it may be prudent for you to notify your local Austin Emergency Officials of the call you experienced.
I made my first reply as possible information as to why you got called and the issue you said happened. How any of this gets turned into my "...immense propensity to always have the last answer" escapes any reasonable logic, as well as the "You lose" comment, which, besides you, thinks communication is a contest with a winner and a loser? I think Rob has made mention of this very thing several times.
As for the comment, "Why you have not been banned is beyond comprehension" I have no comment.
And then as for "The vast majority of your posts are combative" how has my posts in this thread been considered "combative," even considering this response, and in comparison, to yours?
I think it should also be noted that since the November 2025 hack, numerous counties and cities are moving away from using Code Red to other providers.
But at any event, to keep PunaWeb peace and harmony, and boost your fragile male ego, I'll say you won!