04-09-2026, 02:34 AM
Is this the best factor to take into account when considering legislation?
Good question. I'd liken being "hung for not supporting a Hawaiian" for those who do not support the elimination of SNAP and/or Medicaid benefits to tens of millions of people. And perhaps, maybe what one person thinks should happen with anyone who dissents from his whims.
How have other instances of blind obedience to a single rule, a single idea, a single man played out recently?
I have numerous examples to give, but after chowing down on numerous TACO's yesterday, I'm going to hold off for two weeks on supplying any examples.
Will this result in choosing the best candidate for the job? Or is it simply a way to get potential supporters to avoid looking at the shortcomings of a candidate?
In an eerie way, it's almost like saying that only those of a certain race (as well as gender being implied) are only capable of doing the job. Like how some might view an airline pilot for not being in the "correct" race (as well as gender being implied).
Good question. I'd liken being "hung for not supporting a Hawaiian" for those who do not support the elimination of SNAP and/or Medicaid benefits to tens of millions of people. And perhaps, maybe what one person thinks should happen with anyone who dissents from his whims.
How have other instances of blind obedience to a single rule, a single idea, a single man played out recently?
I have numerous examples to give, but after chowing down on numerous TACO's yesterday, I'm going to hold off for two weeks on supplying any examples.
Will this result in choosing the best candidate for the job? Or is it simply a way to get potential supporters to avoid looking at the shortcomings of a candidate?
In an eerie way, it's almost like saying that only those of a certain race (as well as gender being implied) are only capable of doing the job. Like how some might view an airline pilot for not being in the "correct" race (as well as gender being implied).