The bill was of course, poorly written and the intent was for it to be related to commercial catchment systems or large-scale apartment/condo installations that would allow additional development in places where municipal water systems are not readily available. It should be amended to clarify the language so that it stops distracting the "OMG it is going to cause an inspection of my home catchment system" people.
You would think the guy who co-introduced it and wrote it would have done that. Especially since he represents the "water catchment users Capital of Hawaii."
As to PW demographics.. I think the few Tam supporters here when considered as a part of the whole.. says a lot. Says it all.
I'd say the same applies to the Tam detractors. When considered as part of the whole, it says a lot. Says it all.
You would think the guy who co-introduced it and wrote it would have done that. Especially since he represents the "water catchment users Capital of Hawaii."
As to PW demographics.. I think the few Tam supporters here when considered as a part of the whole.. says a lot. Says it all.
I'd say the same applies to the Tam detractors. When considered as part of the whole, it says a lot. Says it all.
“I could say the stupidest things and you’d clap”
-DJT
-DJT