clanker - ironyak is the clear winner
Well obviously ;) Johnny, tell him what he's won! A lifetime of half-assed analyses done via word math matrices, from from any real insight or understanding! (Can't I pick something from the
Broyhill Diamond Head furniture collection instead Vanna-bot? Gotta win back some of those "lost style points" ;)
More seriously, what was the prompt here randomq, as the entire framing of the conversation seems odd. How does one "win" a discussion about "What effect does AI have on people in Puna? What effect does AI have on you?"
HiloJulie - the sheer fallacy that is all of AI
Yeah, shows some serious comprehension issues stemming from its very narrow context window, unlike most posters that are working with years of context for each individual. Gives leilanidude credit for knowing about the CEP program even though I had to
bring it to his attention a month earlier although in a different thread, and somehow thinks Tang's "Future Aloha = 1/1-P(doom)" is a sign of mathematical knowledge of geometric series (how is a simple ratio a geometric series?) "AI" is such a Punaweb noob.
Edge - The good old days.
Maybe so. At least AltaVista was just
DEC showing of its advanced hardware, and wasn't implicated like Facebook/Meta in facilitating
self-harm, mental illness, mass-shootings, election interference, genocide, etc, and, more specifically to Puna, conspiracy theories, scams, and a ton of "AI" generated flyers for Grateful Dead cover bands (I know being derivative is baked into the premise, but does it have to be so on the nose?)
So when Mark "
people who trust me with their data are dumbf#cks" Zuckerberg says "hey, check out our latest product", I say, "nah brah, mo betta no need." You can take this insight from a clear winner. :)
