+- Punaweb Forum (http://punaweb.org/forum)
+-- Forum: Punaweb Forums (http://punaweb.org/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: Punatalk (http://punaweb.org/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=10)
+--- Thread: TMT - Contested Case Hearing Status - Hilo (/showthread.php?tid=17312)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
RE: TMT - Contested Case Hearing Status - Hilo - kalakoa - 08-15-2017
"I can find a Bible quote to support any position."
RE: TMT - Contested Case Hearing Status - Hilo - punaticbychoice - 08-15-2017
gypsy69
Ever hear of a non-sequitur?
By the way, gypsy69 beats their spouse and dog.
There, see how easy that is?[
]
RE: TMT - Contested Case Hearing Status - Hilo - Frank - 08-15-2017
gyp69...your thoughts on the TMT views of Kalepa Baybayan would be appreciated. mahalo
RE: TMT - Contested Case Hearing Status - Hilo - Guest - 08-15-2017
Punaticbychoice
Nice try choice, going on 25 happy years next month with the same spouse and we don't have a dog.
Kalakoa
The bible is a great book to read, more from the last few generations could find reading the bible a good thing today.
Back to the TMT contested case hearing status.
http://khon2.com/2017/07/28/oral-arguments-set-in-tmt-contested-case/
Frank, Mahalo to you.
I have nothing but the greatest respect for Kalepa Baybayan.
Pua Case cross examined Kalepa in the TMT contested case hearing and it was an interesting 25 minutes. If you have not seen it yet it's worth watching and here is the video.
http://www.bigislandvideonews.com/2016/11/02/video-tmt-case-kalepa-baybayan-cross-examined-by-pua-case/
With 23 parties having the right to speak up to 15 minutes and the BLNR led by Stanley Roehrig able to ask several following questions when ever they want. These upcoming Oral arguments may take more than a few days. let me leave you with one great video to watch again.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7EQ2--BA0A
RE: TMT - Contested Case Hearing Status - Hilo - punaticbychoice - 08-15-2017
gypsy thanks, now we've established your married for 25 years and you don't have a dog. So?[
]
RE: TMT - Contested Case Hearing Status - Hilo - HereOnThePrimalEdge - 08-15-2017
gypsy says:
I don't trust Mr Apo and or his decisions or choices.
Not to trust one person, who is not even personally involved in the development or construction of a $1.4 billion project doesn't seem like a strong argument against the approval process.
Does this "don't trust" standard apply only to projects over a billion dollars? A million dollars? A dog house? If impartially and properly applied, we can all plan to move back into caves and lava tubes in the future.
(It's) what the existentialists called "awful freedom" the reinvention of irrationality by marginalized people, just in order to spite science. -Elif Batuman
RE: TMT - Contested Case Hearing Status - Hilo - kalakoa - 08-15-2017
Does this "don't trust" standard apply only to projects over a billion dollars?
I don't trust anyone involved with rail, does that count?
RE: TMT - Contested Case Hearing Status - Hilo - MarkD - 08-15-2017
Just watched the Kalepa Baybayan-Pua Case exchange. The discussion reminded me of something that I thought the first time I visited ‘Imiloa some years back: the concept that astronomy and native Polynesian way-finding are inherently linked is a stretch.
Also believe that perhaps just one person--definitely a pretty insightful individual--came up with this idea. Certainly it is a brilliant public relations strategy. (Big effort with all the displays in ‘Imiloa to establish the link.)
Obviously the intent is for the astronomy field to claim native Polynesian "cred" by sharing a mission with this group--exploration of the stars.
But again, the link seems tenuous. To the Polynesian wayfinders the sky was(is) largely a map for navigation. A tool, as it were. Their objective is not knowledge about the sky (other than novice wayfinders memorizing star patterns), it is seeking knowledge of their whereabouts on the ocean (continually tracking their whereabouts).
Astronomy, briefly, seeks knowledge about the universe. Am I mistaken?
RE: TMT - Contested Case Hearing Status - Hilo - kalakoa - 08-15-2017
To the Polynesian wayfinders the sky was(is) largely a map for navigation. A tool
Simply a matter of scale.
Stars visible with the naked eye provide enough information to navigate the surface of our little planet.
What might we navigate with TMT?
RE: TMT - Contested Case Hearing Status - Hilo - PaulW - 08-15-2017
MarkD, even 10 seconds of googling shows your statement to be just plain hogwash.
http://what-when-how.com/ancient-astronomy/polynesian-and-micronesian-astronomy/