+- Punaweb Forum (http://punaweb.org/forum)
+-- Forum: Punaweb Forums (http://punaweb.org/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: Puna Politics (http://punaweb.org/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=16)
+--- Thread: Hawaii Island anti-vaccination policies (/showthread.php?tid=14737)
RE: Hawaii Island anti-vaccination policies - Anxious Messiah - 10-06-2014
quote:
Originally posted by KathyH
That is not old. Old would be past the statute of limitations for prosecution. It's not.
Kathy
quote:
Originally posted by KathyH
As a move towards introducing some facts into the discussion, this is from Big Island Video, December 2009, almost five years ago...
Kathy
Statute of limitations is 7 years. So, by the standard given by you Kathy, the topic of Sativa and RJ's involvement (as originally posted by TomK) is well within the time frame for discussion and inquiry.
Now, whether either or both care to respond is another matter. Since Sativa's propensity is to divert attention from herself, I doubt she will respond directly (if at all) and try to focus it on the perceived wrong doings of others.
_________________________________________
Don't speak unless you can improve on the silence.
RE: Hawaii Island anti-vaccination policies - missydog1 - 10-06-2014
quote:You are free to talk about stuff from five hundred years ago, but I didn't give any standard of time length for discussion.
Originally posted by Anxious Messiah
Statute of limitations is 7 years. So, by the standard given by you Kathy, the topic of Sativa and RJ's involvement (as originally posted by TomK) is well within the time frame for discussion and inquiry.
The statute of limitations is not "seven years." I have no idea where you got that, but it's nonsense.
In any case, Statute of limitations applies only to liability for suit or prosecution. It literally has no meaning with regards to discussion. I was talking purely about whether the "old" acts Carol mentioned are still subject to police investigation and indictment, not talking about Punaweb discussion.
Do what you want to do guys.
quote:No idea if they will or won't, but as an observer, I see people with their mind's made up already. Where there's no real potential for discussion, there's no incentive to engage.
Now, whether either or both care to respond is another matter.
You're not going to vote for them either way ... oh wait, they're not running for office. [:p]
Kathy
RE: Hawaii Island anti-vaccination policies - Rob Tucker - 10-07-2014
Ah yes, but you do get to choose which mob to join in life and if you are choosing a pitchfork wielding mob you might just be casually interested in who is leading the charge.
So it may be that Sativa and R.J. will choose to not reply to my question. If so she will be neck to neck with someone else she criticizes - Tiffany Hunt. People who can dish it out but can't take it.
But I will continue to ask:
Will R.J. and Sativa give a yes or no answer as to whether or not they were participating in any manner in a multi-level marketing program for Oxysilver - Len Horowitz' alternative to vaccinations?
RE: Hawaii Island anti-vaccination policies - Anxious Messiah - 10-07-2014
#facepalm
_________________________________________
Don't speak unless you can improve on the silence.
RE: Hawaii Island anti-vaccination policies - Mendo - 10-08-2014
Rob says, "you do get to choose which mob to join in life and if you are choosing a pitchfork wielding mob you might just be casually interested in who is leading the charge."
Sometimes Rob is truly eloquent. Thanks Rob for saying this better than I could! Amazing that some people cannot see the hateful, negative energy emanating from these would-be mob-leaders, vaccination issues aside.
RE: Hawaii Island anti-vaccination policies - Rob Tucker - 10-08-2014
I will continue to ask:
Will R.J. and Sativa give a yes or no answer as to whether or not they were participating in any manner in a multi-level marketing program for Oxysilver - Len Horowitz' alternative to vaccinations?
RE: Hawaii Island anti-vaccination policies - Guest - 10-08-2014
Rob, is my tin foil hat on straight?
Rob Tucker quote :"Will R.J. and Sativa give a yes or no answer as to whether or not they were participating in any manner in a multi-level marketing program for Oxysilver - Len Horowitz' alternative to vaccinations?"
It is really amazing, Mr Tucker, how you just go on and on and on about a point that has no merit, whatsoever. If you believe that RJ and I have done anything that is unethical or against the law then make a complaint to the proper authorities. We did! Isn't that why you are so mad?
Rob Tucker quote:"But the bill itself is moot."
Mr. Tucker, you do know the difference between a resolution and bill, don't you? This was a resolution not a bill and the resolve was to send the resolution forward.
This resolution was just meant to take the temperature of the legislators and the community on the subject of forced vaccination as opposed to quarantine. Get jabbed or be quarantined, that's it.
The resolution gave an opportunity for some discussion on this most important issue and all you could do, as your contribution to the discussion, was to hysterically repeat over and over again about how your sister almost got polio but the vaccine saved her. Something like that, wasn't that your story?
This resolution has somehow upset you Mr. Tucker all to hell (and still does almost 5 years later) and you started a course, along with Tiffany Edwards Hunt, (when you both were on the same side prior to your fallout), to vilify the District 5 office staff for doing what the council person wanted done.
We are talking about policy and direction. Discussion and consensus is how things get done. It was relevant and it was intelligent and it passed the council by an overwhelming 7 to 1. It brought to the forefront, again like the voter fraud issue, a very fundamental and basic right in a democracy. The resolution was about responding to crisis without making hasty and unfortunate decisions. And you can't even stand for a conversation to begin without going off and vilifying those of us who were there.
It kind of boils down to the fact that if we don't agree with you Mr. Tucker and some of these folks on the punaweb then you lose your cool and become less then civil.
I have to ask where do you come from, Mr. Tucker, that you cannot even tolerate people who beg to differ with you? I mean literally begging you to be civil but for some reason you take great delight at sniping at RJ and I. How dysfunctional is that?
RE: Hawaii Island anti-vaccination policies - kalakoa - 10-08-2014
just go on and on and on about a point that has no merit, whatsoever
In other words, "no", as in "will not give a yes or no answer". Got it.
RE: Hawaii Island anti-vaccination policies - Guest - 10-08-2014
kalakoa quote:
"In other words, "no", as in "will not give a yes or no answer". Got it."
What is it you want to know?
RE: Hawaii Island anti-vaccination policies - kalakoa - 10-08-2014
What is it you want to know?
See above: "were you, or were you not, involved in any multi-level marketing effort with Len Horowitz". Then note the dissembling repsponse which fails to address the very point.
At this point the issue is moot in that it will not alter the perceived credibility of the people involved. Congratulations on a fine showing!