Candidate Eligibility

[Rob Tucker]

You won't find them here.

Assume the best and ask questions.

Punaweb moderator

[Guest]

quote:

---

Originally posted by Sativa

The finale? You don't want to miss that folks. That is where she is teaching inmates how to be journalists and start blogs from their cells.

Right now, it is intermission, I am going to have some popcorn and refreshments.

---

Nothing but pure malice in these words!

[Guest]

quote:

---

Originally posted by DiscussTruth


Bumped for its reality and truth of this entire matter:

Ignore me all you want, but it is my contention - just like the contentions you have voiced repeatedly over and over and over about how you feel about Tiffany - which, coincidently is just "words" - never any specific detail about anything - just - she is "this" or she is "that" - but it is my contention that you making hundreds of posts on the topic of Tiffany running for Council is doing to her what was done to you by another person in the past.

Further, just as that person did to any person who objected, they automatically became a “troll” and other such names and words applied.

Additionally, I find your hundreds of posts saying the same things over and over and over as well as the hi-jacking of other posts to insert this fixation is in the desire to get as many “words” out there in the internet world so a search finds all these same “hits” causing the uninformed to be even further uninformed. Also, I believe it is caused by an obsessive compulsive disorder.

You have single handedly tried, convicted and even posted the punishments for voter fraud, property tax fraud, failure to file GET tax, along with a host of other “conspiracy theory” matters on this single posting. You have even questioned the proper accounting of her business matters.

I did not know that running for Council required the candidates to produce tax return filings.

But on this blog, her “guilt” is 100% certain.

Because of you.

I am quite sure that if I could find a platform and begin to make hundreds of posts saying derogatory things about you, there would be all sorts of objections flying from you immediately.

And in the end this election has no bearing on you. You do not live here, do not loose or benefit from the District 5 Council member. Further, you have not even commented on the candidates running in your own District.

And yet, not one word about any of the other candidates – good or bad.

One would have to be blind as a bat to not see your motives, your gall and your bullying tactics.

It is – EXACTLY the same thing. Only it’s being done in a different way.

---

[Guest]

Discuss NO Truth quote:

"quote:Originally posted by Sativa

The finale? You don't want to miss that folks. That is where she is teaching inmates how to be journalists and start blogs from their cells.

Right now, it is intermission, I am going to have some popcorn and refreshments.



Nothing but pure malice in these words!"



It is not malice it was sarcasm.

IMO......Malice is what Tiffany did to Emily. Malice is what Tiffany did to Zendo. Malice is what Tiffany did to RJ and I. IMO, Malice is what drove her to register to vote in Emily's district 5, as a disgruntled legislative assistant, hoping she could influence District 5 politics.

Anyone who would like to add a name to the list, please feel free.

[Rob Tucker]

DiscussTruth,

Who is the the "you" in your last post? It is not clear.

BTW, My complaints with Tiffany are entirely based on first hand experience.

[missydog1]

DiscussTruth wrote,

quote:

---

You do not live here, do not loose or benefit from the District 5 Council member. Further, you have not even commented on the candidates running in your own District.

And yet, not one word about any of the other candidates – good or bad.

---

As to candidates of my own district, I certainly have commented. I also stated that because I co-hosted a candidate forum for my district, which put me in a bit of a host-guest relationship with the candidates for that event, that I didn't think I should do much critique of their Q&A.

The candidates I supported in my district either won their seat in the primary or won the party nomination in the primary, so I don't have much need to say anything, as I'm feeling like the best people prevailed there.

I do have an opinion on District 5 Council. I would support Pue'o. With her out of the race, I would support Paleka over Hunt, without question.

Valerie Poindexter is my Councilperson, and I have interacted with her enough in the last two years to give her my full support. She has the local roots, the big heart, the courage, the compassion, the ethics, the knowledge of how to build community that I respect and admire.

As to the suggestion that I'm not involved in my own district -- I helped organize and host a candidate forum with the non-profit organization of which I am Secretary, so I really don't see any grounds for this accusation that I'm apathetic about my district politics.

I hope that answers this question. My personal stake as a resident in the District 5 race? I don't want my councilperson or any other district's councilperson to have to work with the millstone around the collective neck that would come with Tiffany as a council member.

quote:

---

I find your hundreds of posts saying the same things over and over and over as well as the hi-jacking of other posts to insert this fixation is in the desire to get as many “words” out there in the internet world so a search finds all these same “hits” causing the uninformed to be even further uninformed. Also, I believe it is caused by an obsessive compulsive disorder.

---

As for any attempt to manipulate search engines, I started using TEH of first name only to reference Tiffany, and if I wanted to angle for search engines, I would be sure to use her full name as often as possible, but I do not.

The comments about my possible mental disorder are completely off base and inappropriate, and I would respectfully request that you cease with this line of attack. Rob told us to stop needling each other, and I am doing my best to ignore you, but then you post about me ignoring you. Anyhow, this is needling, and I'm asking you to stop.

Kathy

[missydog1]

quote:

---

Originally posted by Rob Tucker

DiscussTruth,

Who is the the "you" in your last post? It is not clear.

BTW, My complaints with Tiffany are entirely based on first hand experience.

---

Hi Rob, the you is not clear in this post, indeed, but this is a reposting of a comment he made in direct response to me (using reply with quotes) earlier in this topic.
Here: http://www.punaweb.org/forum/topic.asp?w..._ID=19048&

That being so, this part of the comment

quote:

---

it is my contention that you making hundreds of posts on the topic of Tiffany running for Council is doing to her what was done to you by another person in the past. Further, just as that person did to any person who objected, they automatically became a “troll” and other such names and words applied.

---

is an indirect way of talking about the person you don't want discussed. I would appreciate it if DiscussTruth would cease subjecting me to references to this off limits topic. I think it's not fair of him to slam me with these comments when I can't respond to them without breaking your rules. (Not that I want to.)

Kathy

[Guest]

quote:

---

Originally posted by Rob Tucker

DiscussTruth,

Who is the the "you" in your last post? It is not clear.

BTW, My complaints with Tiffany are entirely based on first hand experience.

---

My re-post was directed at comments made by the sole single poster who has made over 300 comments derogatory of TEH.

But, I see she has already, as usually is done, she has already answered your question of me, with yet again, another long winded chapter of her need to get as many possible words out on the internet as possible relative to her bullying campaign of TEH.

By the way, my COMPLIMENTS of TEH are based entirely on first hand experience.

To further clarify, I can understand someone not liking a certain candidate.

I can also understand that people may object to what any candidate has done.

However, that being said, I truly believe what has been allowed here on Punaweb, with KathyH - solely - has been the EXACT SAME cyber bullying as was done to her.

Albeit done differently, it is in the exact same vain.

Quite frankly, there is something wrong with a person who has made over 300 of virtually the exact same words over and over and over and over.

[Guest]

quote:

---

Originally posted by Sativa


It is not malice it was sarcasm.

---

You should learn the definition of malice.

Never mind the fact that you and RJ are guilty of the exact same allegations you have made against Tiffany either.

That could enter into a whole new term of malice.

[Rob Tucker]

Interesting.
What comes around goes around I would say.
From my point of view Tiffany is enjoying an environment completely of her own creation.

The core issue may well be: will Tiffany's ability to make enemies derail her ambitions the way she has derailed the ambitions of others?