01-20-2010, 09:55 AM
For just a little more elaboration...
Hwy. 130 is a State highway. The state is obligated to provide one primary route between locations.
PMAR is a secondary route and as such is a County concern.
In a perfect world state and county would work in efficient harmony for a cost effective and elegant solution. That hope has been depreciated by a lot of NIMBY activity in HPP over the years. HPP is smack dab in the middle of the problem. It is my belief that HPP, which contributes substantial traffic, has to play a role in the solution(s). I do know that many, and perhaps most, people in HPP know and understand this and support an alternative route. Everyone is still waiting to see what shape and form PMAR might take. It seems fated though that PMAR will occur years after Hwy. 130.
Hwy. 130 is a State highway. The state is obligated to provide one primary route between locations.
PMAR is a secondary route and as such is a County concern.
In a perfect world state and county would work in efficient harmony for a cost effective and elegant solution. That hope has been depreciated by a lot of NIMBY activity in HPP over the years. HPP is smack dab in the middle of the problem. It is my belief that HPP, which contributes substantial traffic, has to play a role in the solution(s). I do know that many, and perhaps most, people in HPP know and understand this and support an alternative route. Everyone is still waiting to see what shape and form PMAR might take. It seems fated though that PMAR will occur years after Hwy. 130.
Assume the best and ask questions.
Punaweb moderator
Punaweb moderator