03-02-2010, 03:56 PM
Define what we're planning for: then let's plan. Maybe have a half assed reason for what anyone projects. I'm reasonable, and I'll listen. You don't have to agree with me, in spite of the fact there's a lot of data there. You just have something beyond "it's always going to be the same, all the time, forever." The whole "just don't want to hear it" retort is tired and only has a year or two left of steam in it. Rob can quote this one.
Let's quantify, reach consensus within sensible parameters, allowing for error-- then plan. How radical is that?
Rotten deal, getting the conversation dragged kicking and screaming into the realm of quantifiables.
I haven't ever represented myself as diplomatic, only constructive.
Oh, and yes, I will cite example of where doing nothing is a great strategy, but frankly, I must cook dinner, and allow for pressing issues.
You must understand doing "nothing" might be more properly phrased "I don't understand, and I choose to hold position" which is commonly understood among either elite investors or sailors. . .
James, you're the economist, hardly you can disagree.
http://sensiblesimplicity.lefora.com/
Let's quantify, reach consensus within sensible parameters, allowing for error-- then plan. How radical is that?
Rotten deal, getting the conversation dragged kicking and screaming into the realm of quantifiables.
I haven't ever represented myself as diplomatic, only constructive.
Oh, and yes, I will cite example of where doing nothing is a great strategy, but frankly, I must cook dinner, and allow for pressing issues.
You must understand doing "nothing" might be more properly phrased "I don't understand, and I choose to hold position" which is commonly understood among either elite investors or sailors. . .
James, you're the economist, hardly you can disagree.
http://sensiblesimplicity.lefora.com/