07-09-2010, 04:30 PM
Kalama Boy, I think you have injected a big issue in the Civil Union/Marriage debate that is false.
Marriage or Civil Union under Hawaii law, has absolutely nothing to do with sexual conduct. There is no statutory or implied sexual relation clause in the law. It is a contractual relationship to commit to each other. Nothing in Hawaii law or even religious marriage doctrine, says that sex is a component of marriage. As a matter of fact, heterosexual couples who engaged in sex must do so by consent. A legally married man and woman can be criminally charged with rape if sex is forced without consent. Marriage between man and women does not grant rights to sex any more or less than any man or woman.
Briging sexual conduct into the debate is not grounded in facts under the law or even under the vows of most religious marriage.
Also, the issue of homosexuality is false because most people opposed to same sex marriages or civil unions are not against homosexuality. You put all the people who oppose same sex marriage or civil unions on the basis of homosexuality into a room, and you leave a DVD of John Wayne Reads the Bible, The History of the American Dollar, and Sorority Girls Gone Wild, we all know which DVD will be watched until it wears out. So how can they be so against same sex commitments when sex is not a requirement, yet watch girl on girl until their hair falls out? Obviously they like homosexual sexual conduct when it gets them off.
Marriage or Civil Union under Hawaii law, has absolutely nothing to do with sexual conduct. There is no statutory or implied sexual relation clause in the law. It is a contractual relationship to commit to each other. Nothing in Hawaii law or even religious marriage doctrine, says that sex is a component of marriage. As a matter of fact, heterosexual couples who engaged in sex must do so by consent. A legally married man and woman can be criminally charged with rape if sex is forced without consent. Marriage between man and women does not grant rights to sex any more or less than any man or woman.
Briging sexual conduct into the debate is not grounded in facts under the law or even under the vows of most religious marriage.
Also, the issue of homosexuality is false because most people opposed to same sex marriages or civil unions are not against homosexuality. You put all the people who oppose same sex marriage or civil unions on the basis of homosexuality into a room, and you leave a DVD of John Wayne Reads the Bible, The History of the American Dollar, and Sorority Girls Gone Wild, we all know which DVD will be watched until it wears out. So how can they be so against same sex commitments when sex is not a requirement, yet watch girl on girl until their hair falls out? Obviously they like homosexual sexual conduct when it gets them off.