09-08-2010, 11:27 AM
Kathy,
This topic is not posted for your approval or denial, nor is it posted as a platform for you to tell us about you or your family. Stick to the damn issue for once and get off your soapbox. MOST OF US DON’T GIVE A DAMN!
The issue is about inappropriate zoning practices and segregation/favoritisms by virtue of inappropriately applied zoning. If you can’t have an adult conversation about a very real issue, it’s hereby recommend that you create Punaweb Romper-room where you can create a special “Show and Tell” section as well a special section that is “All about KathyH”.
Bob Orts,
I agree with the initial portion of your statements but disagree with the later portion.
I fully comprehend Zoning and have been a party to forming such regulations in the past.
Typical residential use of land in a Hotel zone is commonly a residual after math by virtue of pre existing houses that are absorbed into a zoning change, it’s not by design. To zone a region Hotel that will be used for residential purposes is not standard zoning practice and Frankly - ass backwards.
Edit to add-
Seeb,
I agree, but am not so dismissive about the Hotel zoning practices. Each shows a predisposition with regard to dirty zoning practices and not a one is acceptable. If something like this were to land in the courts, the County would be hung out to dry (that’s our tax dollars further burned away).
In general -
Consider the value application of land zoning.
From agricultural use through and to resort/hotel use, the values of land hinge considerably on those designations. Zoning tools are not to be used to drive land values for private gains for the few or to segregate communities. They are meant to establish order in infrastructure.
If one region is most wholly designated hotel regardless of its usage, then all regions should be afforded the same designation. Why bother with zoning at all if it’s not used appropriately? We may as well toss it out the window if it’s going to be abused.
This topic is not posted for your approval or denial, nor is it posted as a platform for you to tell us about you or your family. Stick to the damn issue for once and get off your soapbox. MOST OF US DON’T GIVE A DAMN!
The issue is about inappropriate zoning practices and segregation/favoritisms by virtue of inappropriately applied zoning. If you can’t have an adult conversation about a very real issue, it’s hereby recommend that you create Punaweb Romper-room where you can create a special “Show and Tell” section as well a special section that is “All about KathyH”.
Bob Orts,
I agree with the initial portion of your statements but disagree with the later portion.
I fully comprehend Zoning and have been a party to forming such regulations in the past.
Typical residential use of land in a Hotel zone is commonly a residual after math by virtue of pre existing houses that are absorbed into a zoning change, it’s not by design. To zone a region Hotel that will be used for residential purposes is not standard zoning practice and Frankly - ass backwards.
Edit to add-
Seeb,
I agree, but am not so dismissive about the Hotel zoning practices. Each shows a predisposition with regard to dirty zoning practices and not a one is acceptable. If something like this were to land in the courts, the County would be hung out to dry (that’s our tax dollars further burned away).
In general -
Consider the value application of land zoning.
From agricultural use through and to resort/hotel use, the values of land hinge considerably on those designations. Zoning tools are not to be used to drive land values for private gains for the few or to segregate communities. They are meant to establish order in infrastructure.
If one region is most wholly designated hotel regardless of its usage, then all regions should be afforded the same designation. Why bother with zoning at all if it’s not used appropriately? We may as well toss it out the window if it’s going to be abused.