11-06-2011, 06:07 AM
First off, if they had done a traffic study, I think they would find there was no problem on Papio to begin with.... CPP would require wider speed bumps and it would be near impossible to keep people from driving around them in the grass, just like what they are dealing with on Papio now..... I don't know why I bother entertaining any of these silly scenarios. The traffic has to go somewhere, this is exactly the problem, its like damming up a river. Most people look at this from the wrong perspective, no one can prove there was a problem to begin with.... There was absolutely no need for such drastic action, as I said before, trees by the road would look much better and would be more effective in slowing traffic.(not diverting it.)
Why would the solution be to spend thousands of dollars subjecting almost 100% non-problematic traffic to un-necessary speed bumps? Please for the love of god try and answer that question, anybody!! Their goal was to move the highway plain and simple, not because it was dangerous, but because they did not like the traffic. Please prove otherwise, anyone!
Why would the solution be to spend thousands of dollars subjecting almost 100% non-problematic traffic to un-necessary speed bumps? Please for the love of god try and answer that question, anybody!! Their goal was to move the highway plain and simple, not because it was dangerous, but because they did not like the traffic. Please prove otherwise, anyone!