05-14-2012, 02:59 PM
Why do we think that one girl with a gun would prevail over three guys with a gun and a superior vantage point (a vehicle over a bike)?
You can't assume that only the victim would have been armed if there were relaxed gun laws. More realistically, the perps would have been armed, because they were macho creeps who would carry if they could, while she would still have been the unarmed girl who sees good in everyone and rides her bike without protection. Even if she did carry, 3-1 is not good odds. Or 2-1, depending on what you think is the true story.
You can't assume that only the victim would have been armed if there were relaxed gun laws. More realistically, the perps would have been armed, because they were macho creeps who would carry if they could, while she would still have been the unarmed girl who sees good in everyone and rides her bike without protection. Even if she did carry, 3-1 is not good odds. Or 2-1, depending on what you think is the true story.