12-26-2012, 08:44 AM
As far as zoning, the technicalities for Nanavale are:
Most lots are technically A-1-a (agricultural, 1 acre minimum lot size) with the current size grandfathered as "legal nonconforming" because the subdivision was created post-State but pre-County.
Some of the front lots are actually zoned R (residential) and have county water.
In either case, the strict CC&Rs attempt to force "residential" behavior; I'm not sure how effective this actually is, there are plenty of violations, but seems like only one has escalated all the way to legal action.
Note also that the nearby "Nanavale Farm Lots" are not part of the "Estates", these are acutal ag-zoned acreage.
Most lots are technically A-1-a (agricultural, 1 acre minimum lot size) with the current size grandfathered as "legal nonconforming" because the subdivision was created post-State but pre-County.
Some of the front lots are actually zoned R (residential) and have county water.
In either case, the strict CC&Rs attempt to force "residential" behavior; I'm not sure how effective this actually is, there are plenty of violations, but seems like only one has escalated all the way to legal action.
Note also that the nearby "Nanavale Farm Lots" are not part of the "Estates", these are acutal ag-zoned acreage.