01-26-2013, 04:33 AM
Well, I am sure there is a lesson in here for me. My point is that whereas Carey found the emphasis on documenting injuries noteworthy I actually found the lack of emphasis and failure to address that particular question in the forum noteworthy. I was highlighting the difference in our viewpoints.
To be fair, there are those who, in such a situation, would dramatically describe how the dog attacked them and how they would have been "dead" if they had not done X, Y or Z, whereas the fact that they don't have a scratch would suggest otherwise. I don't think that is the case here but I do think that it is a perfectly legitimate question to ask (about documenting the injuries).
To be fair, there are those who, in such a situation, would dramatically describe how the dog attacked them and how they would have been "dead" if they had not done X, Y or Z, whereas the fact that they don't have a scratch would suggest otherwise. I don't think that is the case here but I do think that it is a perfectly legitimate question to ask (about documenting the injuries).