11-26-2013, 06:31 AM
One of the reasons I am so skeptical of blanket results such as the tables above is that in effect they state that you can know how nutritious either of the groups are. I read a book, Gardening When It Counts, that said that analysis of medical records of army inductees showed significant nutrition based differences in health depending on where the inductee grew up. Perhaps the tables above were based on cherry-picked data where the organic produce was from a highly fertile area and non-organics were from a really hard-scrabble area. This is really basic science and the data above seems not to address the issue at all.