11-29-2013, 08:38 AM
Here's an example that doesn't involve GMO.
Government provides research grants on the long-term effects of marijuana use. However, they only fund research into the negative side effects. Eventually there is a body of research, all of which supports the idea that "marijuana is bad".
Truth is relative. How about showing some balanced results and letting people decide for themselves whether to indulge in potentially "dangerous" activities?
A good product which benefits society should be able to stand on its own merits.
Government provides research grants on the long-term effects of marijuana use. However, they only fund research into the negative side effects. Eventually there is a body of research, all of which supports the idea that "marijuana is bad".
Truth is relative. How about showing some balanced results and letting people decide for themselves whether to indulge in potentially "dangerous" activities?
A good product which benefits society should be able to stand on its own merits.