01-14-2014, 05:25 AM
Deer would have less impact from a global scale perspective but not for the reasons of the BS greenhouse gas theory. After the human population begins to die off from relying on deer for meat and having to hunt it down through ineffective means, the ecosystem would begin to recover as the human population dwindled and returned to the ancient loincloth lifestyle.
- Armed citizens provide security of a free State.
quote:
Originally posted by Bullwinkle
Beef or deer? which would have less impact? - from our agreed upon reputable source:
"according to a 2006 report by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), our diets and, specifically, the meat in them cause more greenhouse gases carbon dioxide (CO2), methane, nitrous oxide, and the like to spew into the atmosphere than either transportation or industry. (Greenhouse gases trap solar energy, thereby warming the earth's surface"
http://www.scientificamerican.com/articl...-hamburger
- Armed citizens provide security of a free State.