01-20-2014, 02:43 AM
quote:
Originally posted by DaVinci
Trying to follow the logic here... So Hawaii is ranked one of the safest states in all the land... but somehow it's also grossly negligent when it comes to public safety... And living in the shadow of an active volcano is just as safe as any other "surface" on the planet, (and thinking otherwise is blatant extremism), but at the same time, it's so dangerous that my gracious we need a plan and we need it now.
Logic? Start with keeping up in the flow of reasoning and leave your logic out of it. First off - "Hawaii is ranked one of the safest states in all the land" then you applied inappropriate reasoning citing "public safety" when in-fact it is not the best in a public safety ranking... it's "natural disasters". Let's read it again as was originally expressed "...Hawaii ranked as among the safest States to live in the United States when it comes to potential natural disasters"
As per the rest of what you wrote... I'd recommend re-reading what I wrote and keep it in context this time and try not to arrange it in a disjointed jumble as you have done above. Don't remove a section from one reply and put into another reply out of context.
If some person writes "the sky is blue and the cat is black" - it's not translated as "the sky is black and the cat is blue".
- Armed citizens provide security of a free State.