01-25-2014, 12:22 AM
Rene, here are my answers to your questions.
1) Whatever cash Bo was carrying was for his everyday purchases. The money for the land purchase would have been wired the day that the land deal was going to be finalized. Bo never made it to the realtor appointment where the deal was set to be finalized and the money wired for payment.
2) No, my father never "brought large boat" to Hawaii. My father has a sailboat in Alaska. Since he purchased the vessel, it hasn't left the nearby waters for more than a day trip. Our harbor has an advanced monitoring/video surveillance system that can vouch for what I just stated. It would take weeks to sail from where we live in Alaska to Hawaii.
3) No, our family has not received the DNA test results of the unborn child. No offense meant to the Royals or Brittany, but if the child Brittany was carrying was Bo's, we have a right to know this as well. That child would have been my niece or nephew. It would be a blood relative and this information should have been released to both families. This is my opinion only, I do not know Hawaiian law on the matter. Since Julie has previously posted that she "will not comment on the DNA results" of the fetus and "would appreciate it not being brought up again," it has made me think that it must not have been Bo's child. If it was his child why keep it from us? Don't we have the right to know? Apparently not OR apparently not yet. Do we have the right to know the identity of the father, if not Bo? No, I don't think so, but the least that could be done was letting us know if the child was Bo's or not. However, I could understand her not wanting to put this sensitive info on a public forum. I could not put this issue at rest for you. No disrespect meant. It's a touchy subject for everyone.
1) Whatever cash Bo was carrying was for his everyday purchases. The money for the land purchase would have been wired the day that the land deal was going to be finalized. Bo never made it to the realtor appointment where the deal was set to be finalized and the money wired for payment.
2) No, my father never "brought large boat" to Hawaii. My father has a sailboat in Alaska. Since he purchased the vessel, it hasn't left the nearby waters for more than a day trip. Our harbor has an advanced monitoring/video surveillance system that can vouch for what I just stated. It would take weeks to sail from where we live in Alaska to Hawaii.
3) No, our family has not received the DNA test results of the unborn child. No offense meant to the Royals or Brittany, but if the child Brittany was carrying was Bo's, we have a right to know this as well. That child would have been my niece or nephew. It would be a blood relative and this information should have been released to both families. This is my opinion only, I do not know Hawaiian law on the matter. Since Julie has previously posted that she "will not comment on the DNA results" of the fetus and "would appreciate it not being brought up again," it has made me think that it must not have been Bo's child. If it was his child why keep it from us? Don't we have the right to know? Apparently not OR apparently not yet. Do we have the right to know the identity of the father, if not Bo? No, I don't think so, but the least that could be done was letting us know if the child was Bo's or not. However, I could understand her not wanting to put this sensitive info on a public forum. I could not put this issue at rest for you. No disrespect meant. It's a touchy subject for everyone.