Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
variance after-the-fact
#1
Classic.

http://www.hawaiitribune-herald.com/news...rowds-road

Part of the facility -- a maintenance building -- was built 10 feet closer to the road than allowed by county zoning code. ... The configuration isn't an error, but part of the original plans

All the approved plans I've seen have rubber-stamped caveats all over them -- and some of these are specifically about front/side/rear setbacks.

It would seem that County projects don't need review/approval from the Building department? Maybe they figured it was no big deal to grant themselves a variance?

Of course, this is the same project with an "unknown amount" of pre-approved overtime... let's skip the ethics investigation and file some criminal charges already.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
variance after-the-fact - by kalakoa - 10-15-2016, 04:07 AM
RE: variance after-the-fact - by Kapoho Joe - 10-15-2016, 04:59 AM
RE: variance after-the-fact - by kalakoa - 10-15-2016, 11:22 AM
RE: variance after-the-fact - by randomq - 10-15-2016, 04:34 PM
RE: variance after-the-fact - by kalakoa - 10-16-2016, 03:46 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)