04-27-2014, 05:39 AM
I think I have a solution.
Since there is no study or research prepared by man that can be relied upon or trusted what is needed is a reasonably priced device that can detect the presence of GMO in food. So each individual can take charge of their own food future.
A device that would sell for, say, three easy payments of $19.95, be hand held and display the results in an easy to understand format.... green light you eat, red light you don't eat.
What is needed is something resembling (or perhaps even might be) a stud finder.
Since a stud finder is designed to indicate the presence of something or nothing - a little minor calibration, a little repackaging and relabeling and a free market, non governmental solution might just be at hand. The development of this device should be much, much cheaper than relabeling hundreds of thousands of food items. And it would certainly be profitable for that fortunate soul who brought the device to market.
Hmmmm.
© 2014 Rob Tucker
Since there is no study or research prepared by man that can be relied upon or trusted what is needed is a reasonably priced device that can detect the presence of GMO in food. So each individual can take charge of their own food future.
A device that would sell for, say, three easy payments of $19.95, be hand held and display the results in an easy to understand format.... green light you eat, red light you don't eat.
What is needed is something resembling (or perhaps even might be) a stud finder.
Since a stud finder is designed to indicate the presence of something or nothing - a little minor calibration, a little repackaging and relabeling and a free market, non governmental solution might just be at hand. The development of this device should be much, much cheaper than relabeling hundreds of thousands of food items. And it would certainly be profitable for that fortunate soul who brought the device to market.
Hmmmm.
© 2014 Rob Tucker
Assume the best and ask questions.
Punaweb moderator
Punaweb moderator