Candidate Eligibility

[missydog1]

Hmm, well I thought I was done with this thread, but I came back to read and find a new poster with questions for me. I don't think I would have nearly so many responses if other posters had not elected to focus on me and grill me for my motives.

Short answer: There is only one candidate who is likely to win AND needs exposure of the other side to counter the big PR campaign, Tiffany. I think the others are either admirable people, or have no shot at winning, or both, so there is no reason to focus on them -- for my part. Anyone here is welcome to focus on anyone they want, other than myself of course (according to DicussTruth).

quote:

---

In fact, I would say that what was once being done to you by a certain cartoonist, has been replaced by you doing virtually the same thing to Tiffany.

---

This is not true and is way out of line, extremely off base and offensive. It brings up a lot of pain, particularly as the cartoonist said and drew a lot of darkness about my dear father, who just died, and I'm still dealing with the loss. When you bring it up, I think about how awful that was, and the things he drew and said about my sweet mother. Don't EVER compare that abuse to my legitimate questioning of a political candidate.

Throughout this topic I've had questions lobbed at me about the cartoonist, which I already mentioned is a topic Rob as the person with control of Punaweb doesn't allow.

So here it is again, and I'd ask Rob to either state that it's off limits by his own rules (not mine), and delete the heckling about it, or allow me to answer (as briefly as I can). Because I don't think it's fair that I can be asked about it but am not allowed to respond. I'm not dodging it. I'm respecting Rob's moderation, but you are not.

As I said earlier in the topic, anyone who genuinely wants to know about that can email me. I personally think it's completely off topic to even go there. I just don't like being put into a position where if I don't answer I look like I have nothing to say for myself, and if I do answer I am falling for trolling. This topic isn't about me or my motives.

As I've said before, there is either truth in the issue regarding the taxes and registration or there is not. When you stoop to attacking the messenger, you have acknowledged that you have nothing of substance to say about the actual issue, so the only way you can deflect people's attention is to get them focused elsewhere by accusing the messenger of bad motives.

Anyhow, it's late and I have a bunch of spider bites I'm dealing with, and I had to take Benadryl, which knocked me out. So I'm going to go see about missing dinner, clean up the kitchen and go back to bed.