08-21-2014, 09:03 AM
Morgan: I'm still here in the wings Chunkster. I hope you understand that I have to keep a low profile, but I will try to give input when appropriate....and helpful, and not "stir the pot" as someone suggested I was doing early on. Receivership has its pros and cons. A lot got done, mainly because of strong, Court appointed professional management and little, if any, involvement of the Board.
quote:
Originally posted by Chunkster
It should be noted that Kahunascott is the recently terminated general manager, and thus might not be fully objective. I have spoken with several HPP residents who lived here with contracted professional management under receivership, and they described it as the best period they can recall. Also, I believe Morgan Sky, when she was posting early in the hu-hu, described the receivership management as competent and able to get some paving done without bond money. Sounds good to me. I have no confidence in the current or previous board to get anything constructive done. Can we petition Judge Nakamura to put us back into receivership?