10-01-2014, 01:25 PM
Well, is it not Graham who keeps pointing to the organizations he touches/is legally connected to, while disavowing personal knowledge or responsibility? Why not tell Graham to take responsibility and stop bringing down the innocents then?
And why doesn't the HVC distance itself from him if it disapproves of such actions?
Why did the land board fine both Belly Acres (Village Green Society) and HVC? If HVC had no part of it, can it not appeal?
Why did no one make an appearance at the hearing and testify to HVC's non-involvement?
I'm not asking in a sarcastic tone. I really would like to know, and if you understand how the inter-relationships work, terry, perhaps you can shed light.
Kathy
PS. I think that explaining the whole disaster as a product of personal hatred is a very skewed and unproductive way to look at it. Even if the motives were totally not righteous (which I don't believe at all but for sake of argument), the decision to enforce laws has nothing to do with how of from whom law enforcement obtains information. If the information is bad, it goes nowhere. If it's on point, the investigation goes somewhere.
And why doesn't the HVC distance itself from him if it disapproves of such actions?
Why did the land board fine both Belly Acres (Village Green Society) and HVC? If HVC had no part of it, can it not appeal?
Why did no one make an appearance at the hearing and testify to HVC's non-involvement?
I'm not asking in a sarcastic tone. I really would like to know, and if you understand how the inter-relationships work, terry, perhaps you can shed light.
Kathy
PS. I think that explaining the whole disaster as a product of personal hatred is a very skewed and unproductive way to look at it. Even if the motives were totally not righteous (which I don't believe at all but for sake of argument), the decision to enforce laws has nothing to do with how of from whom law enforcement obtains information. If the information is bad, it goes nowhere. If it's on point, the investigation goes somewhere.