10-05-2014, 08:28 AM
Rob, no need to get all aggravated. I see your question, and I'm not answering it or addressing it because I'm not RJ or Sativa.
TomK started the topic and he framed it as a question about anti-vaccination "policy." He didn't mention that Oxy-Silver was the only thing he wanted to hear about. He didn't mention it at all. I responded with some history on the "policy" in 2009. I'm not redefining what was going on in this country at that time. I'm adding context. Most of the verbiage is quotes pulled out of the ACLU published paper so people can see why I linked it.
If Sativa had an additional personal project relating to childhood immunization, then maybe you could explain what you saw so that someone who wasn't there (which is a lot of people on this forum) will really understand it?
Whatever her private crusade may have been, which I fully agree I do not know and am not trying to say I do, the public "policy" result was what I shared above from the Council Meeting where it was passed by a good majority of the Council, and it was about the 2009 flu pandemic.
Whatever Sativa may have said to people on the street, she has free speech rights and she was not employed by the County! And I'm fairly sure even County employees have free speech rights when they're not on the clock.
Btw, Sen. Russell Ruderman sells silver products touted to have amazing healing and preventative virtues in his stores, and I don't see you flipping out about that.
Don't get me wrong, I think Horowitz is a shyster. From what little Sativa has told me, or RJ, they think so too. But it's up to them to give you a reply to your specific question if they so choose. My post was directed to Tom's opening to the topic.
Kathy
TomK started the topic and he framed it as a question about anti-vaccination "policy." He didn't mention that Oxy-Silver was the only thing he wanted to hear about. He didn't mention it at all. I responded with some history on the "policy" in 2009. I'm not redefining what was going on in this country at that time. I'm adding context. Most of the verbiage is quotes pulled out of the ACLU published paper so people can see why I linked it.
If Sativa had an additional personal project relating to childhood immunization, then maybe you could explain what you saw so that someone who wasn't there (which is a lot of people on this forum) will really understand it?
Whatever her private crusade may have been, which I fully agree I do not know and am not trying to say I do, the public "policy" result was what I shared above from the Council Meeting where it was passed by a good majority of the Council, and it was about the 2009 flu pandemic.
Whatever Sativa may have said to people on the street, she has free speech rights and she was not employed by the County! And I'm fairly sure even County employees have free speech rights when they're not on the clock.
Btw, Sen. Russell Ruderman sells silver products touted to have amazing healing and preventative virtues in his stores, and I don't see you flipping out about that.
Don't get me wrong, I think Horowitz is a shyster. From what little Sativa has told me, or RJ, they think so too. But it's up to them to give you a reply to your specific question if they so choose. My post was directed to Tom's opening to the topic.
Kathy