10-06-2014, 04:09 PM
quote:You are free to talk about stuff from five hundred years ago, but I didn't give any standard of time length for discussion.
Originally posted by Anxious Messiah
Statute of limitations is 7 years. So, by the standard given by you Kathy, the topic of Sativa and RJ's involvement (as originally posted by TomK) is well within the time frame for discussion and inquiry.
The statute of limitations is not "seven years." I have no idea where you got that, but it's nonsense.
In any case, Statute of limitations applies only to liability for suit or prosecution. It literally has no meaning with regards to discussion. I was talking purely about whether the "old" acts Carol mentioned are still subject to police investigation and indictment, not talking about Punaweb discussion.
Do what you want to do guys.
quote:No idea if they will or won't, but as an observer, I see people with their mind's made up already. Where there's no real potential for discussion, there's no incentive to engage.
Now, whether either or both care to respond is another matter.
You're not going to vote for them either way ... oh wait, they're not running for office. [:p]
Kathy