10-22-2014, 08:52 AM
quote:
Originally posted by james weatherford
The apologists for the current board are consistent:
1. personal attacks on those who challenge that board.
2. claims that alleged actions by others were wrong so the wrongful actions by this board are to be ignored.
Proving that this board's actions are indefensible.
About my "membership". Correct, my name is not on a deed.
Never said it was.
Of course, neither would these names be on any deed: "Orchidlandguy", "mermaid53", "karma96749", etc.
Now you're grasping for straws making personal attacks and spreading misinformation regarding deeds. I've not posted anything about your name being on your deed or not.
Now that you've told us all that your name isn't on a deed for property in HPP, that reveals you're not an association member. This means you can't speak during owner input at any HPP meetings again, much less yelling from the gallery which then you can be escorted out immediately as a non member. I believe your comments about association business as a non member are supposed to be disregarded.
Your group, as evident with your posting and others you know, are the ones who started the personal attacks to even non board members without provocation. Your group is the one who consistently challenges the board at board and general meetings in a disruptive and disrespectful way. Your group is also disrespecting innocent lot owners who've taken their time to attend meetings to get informed and can't. This has caused a very negative atmosphere for all of us.
Your group has taken your actions to a whole other level that is mean and vindictive in the name of supporting your terminated employee friends. What does this say about the character of the terminated employees who must be supporting your group's bad behavior to include disrespect towards other association members? You guys need to get a grip and stop this nonsense. This dispute is between them and some of the new board. Leave it up to them to duke it out and stop ruining HPP's name in public. You and the 2 other terminated employees may not care about that not owning in HPP but I would think the 1 terminated employee would care about the value of his HPP properties.